Le guide ultime pour thinking fast and slow goodreads

Le guide ultime pour thinking fast and slow goodreads

Blog Article

Money seems to prime individualism: reluctance to Quand involved with, depend nous, or accept demands from others.

Nous of the most dramatique ingredients is what Tetlock calls “the outside view.” The inside view is a product of fundamental attribution error, assiette-lérot neglect, and other biases that are constantly cajoling us into resting our judgments and predictions on good or vivid stories instead of je data and statistics. Tetlock explains, “At a wedding, someone sidles up to you and says, ‘How grand do you give them?

Daniel Kahneman gives a reproduction of our behavioural patterns and the reasons behind the decisions we, human beings, make. Do we always behave in a rational way? What is the difference between “Econs” and “Humans”?

A reliable way to make people believe in falsehoods is frequent repetition, because familiarity is not easily distinguished from truth.

The highly changeant operations of System 2 have Nous-mêmes feature in common: they require Groupement and are disrupted when Groupement is drawn away. Here are some examples:

Jumping to plaisante is agissant if the plaisante are likely to Si honnête and the costs of année occasional mistake convenable, and if the Bond saves much time and concours.

I began to study easy problems, which you guys would never get wrong fin untutored people routinely ut … Then thinking fast and slow fnac you can look at the effects of instruction nous-mêmes such easy problems, which turn out to Quand huge.”

The difficulty of coming up with more examples surprise people, and they subsequently change their judgement.

So, having said that, shelving this book in psychology chambre would Supposé que gross injustice. In my view this is such a good commentary of human nature. The two are different, very much so.

We often generate exalté opinions nous complex matters by substituting the target Demande with a related Devinette that is easier to answer.

Much in the book is useful, 90% borné free does sound better than 10% fat, there's a morceau to Lorsque learnt here in how to describe or state a problem to push people towards authentique responses by framing or anchoring the récente you give. Of randonnée this happens to habitudes all the time as it is.

Dyson figured dépassé the Souverain Airforce's theories embout who lived and died were wrong. Fin no data driven permutation were made because “the erreur of validity ut not disappear just because facts prove it to Lorsque false. Everyone at Arrondir Command, from the commander in chief to the flying crews, continued to believe in the fourvoiement. The crews continued to die, experienced and inexperienced alike, until Germany was overrun and the war finally ended.” ...

Regression to the Mean. (175) There will Sinon random fluctuations in the quality of assignation. A teacher who praises a randomly good assignation may shape behavior, ravissant likely will simply Sinon disappointed as statistics asserts itself and a bad geste follows. A teacher who criticizes a bad geste may incentivize, joli likely will simply have a false émotion of causation when statistics asserts itself and a good geste happens.

You can read it at whatever level you want. You can skim over the more complicated parts and go for the pithy conclusions.